The OntoGame Competition: starting NOW!

Win a cool OntoGame T-Shirt in the OntoGame competition: the first three players in the OntoGame ranking on January 31, 2008 at 11:59 pm win one of our cool OntoGame T-Shirts.

Check out www.ontogame.org

Let's Play!

OntoGame Up and Runnin'!

As some of the OntoGame players might have noticed, OntoGame was offline yesterday due to server problems. However, we fixed them and OntoGame is up and runnin' again.

Please play again :)

Another comment

I like the idea very, very much, and I think it has a very strong potential.

What I like about OntoGame (from the survey)

I like reading bits of wikipedia, and the idea that playing the game is productive, and the collaborative element is a nice idea.

A comment from a survey we conducted

+ Quite a good game mechanic (reliance on speed as well as accuracy) + Nice to feel you're contributing to something useful

A comment by a player

First, I like that it's a way to add more sementic info to the data. More to the game itself, it would be great if there were more variety in the types of items coming up. The frequency of people being the resource started to make it a bit repetitive. (However, the addition of the shortcut to gender info was a smart move). Because I have a bit of knowledge about semantic web ontologies, I sometimes found that that knowledge might be making me choose options that seem quite obvious, but my partner chooses something different. I'd be curious about what data you would get if people were paired according to whether they are familiar with rdf, foaf, skos or whether they are not. I think that I'd respond to the game -- and learn more from it myself -- if I could see that info about my partner. Thanks much--I love the game!